Saturday, 31 January 2015

Edited pieces after audience research

DigiPack
Before

After

  • I got a lot of feedback from my target audience on both my auxiliary tasks. Some of the good things that they said about my DigiPack was that "the simplistic style works well", "i like the consistency" & "pleasing contemporary design". After asking them, I also decided to change a couple of things. One person told me that the front cover looked to overcrowded with the amount of shapes so I decided to get rid of one to make Molly stand out more. Also, someone commented on the fact that sepia didn't quite match the black background and so I decided to make them black and white. Another person said how they thought the 4 photos shouldn't be all the same so I decided to change two. It just looks a little different which I like. 

Website
Before


After


  • Some of the positive comments on my website were that people thought it was "has a constant professional look", "easy to navigate", "the black and white colour scheme works really well" & "very user friendly". But then I also asked for ways to improve my website. I got feedback like "more information", "increase of logo size", "add more music advertisement" & "add more photos". This encouraged me to change a few things on my website. I decided to edit my cover photo at the top of my whole website. It was also commented on, that the edges were a bit rough and so I softened up the edges of the image. I also changed the size of logo as, it was a consistent theme throughout, it needed to be larger to make it stand out more. I also updated my information sections and added more to it, this is what a few people commented on so I felt I should add more information. Also, another thing was that there wasn't enough advertisement of her music, especially her new music video, so I added a new section on the homepage to communicate this. I also felt like, after receiving the feedback, a few more natural photos were needed. I decided to use realistic, sometimes unaware, images to communicate her innocence and down-to-earth-ness. I'm glad I changed what I did, as it seems more professional and natural. 

Saturday, 10 January 2015

Homework: Past Student Evaluation Analysis

Question 1) In what ways does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?
Shannon Lewis


Q1 from Shanandcris
  • This evaluation talks a lot about the reasons behind why she did what she did. For example, she lists all of Goodwin's Seven theories of music video and then says whether or not she complied or challenged these conventions and the reasons behind it. She also researched real media products so that she could create the most realistic product possible, but also challenged some conventions (eg. used reviews on her poster, typically on movie posters, but then just explained why she decided to that). She has used SlideShare which is quite a boring and simple technology. She has imported lots of relevant images to back up what she is saying but it is a still just a powerpoint and has limited interaction. I don't really like this type of technology and don't think that I am going to use it for one of my evaluation questions. Her aim was clearly just to get the relevant and important information across to the reader and didn't necessarily think of it as an important factor to make it really interactive. This has made me want to make sure all my question answers are interactive and fun for the audience.

Question 2) How effective is the combination of your main product and auxiliary tasks?
Lew Parker


  • He went into great detail of research about the consistency of artists and their style. He even created a branding project which he discusses in detail and how the synergy of all the media products will generate interest. Also, through his own personal research he discovered 'the House Style'. He researched a lot to understand how to create the most realistic and professional media products. I really like how Lew presented his evaluation. He made a Prezi to present all 4 evaluation questions and then individually posted his questions within the Prezi. Question 2 happened to also be a Prezi, but using other technologies within a technology is very original and clever. Also, Prezi's a very user-friendly site yet still very interactive. Although, his research is extremely detailed which is why he got the highest possible grade, for the reader the big long paragraphs are a little boring so maybe cutting them down and adding in more features (images, videos) would be better. (In fairness, his other evaluation questions are more interesting with videos and whizzy features, etc,)

Question 3) What have you learned from your audience feedback? 
Mark Logan


  • Using glogster was a really good way to answer this question. You can import anything and make it really fun and interactive. It's a really creative way to present work. As it is very easy way to import loads of cool whizzy features, it meant for this question you could put in little quotes from audience members, images, videos, lots of writing, etc. After looking at Mark's work I now know to include lots about the different types of media I used to get as much target audience research as possible, to include all the different ways I collected this data (surveys, videos, etc.) and then also whether or not the research I collected was good, bad, relevant, I needed more, etc. Although, considering glogster is open to endless possibilities of creativeness, I feel that I could add in loads more little things, like clips and more information is small and large sections.   
Question 4) How did you use media technologies in the construction, research, planning and evaluation stages? 
Daisy Beaven


  • There are a lot of media technologies I would not have necessary considered talking about until reading Daisy's evaluation. This includes everything from the internet, to the computers, to blogger, cameras, different websites, etc. Also using images of hardware you're talking about and maybe screenshots of software that your talking will make it a lot more interesting and make more sense for the reader to read. Also, including all the technologies from all the stages, there is a lot to talk about and so will be one of the easier questions to answer. Although Daisy has talked about a lot of different technologies, I would say I would add more detail to all of them as for some them she briefly describes them and then I would also explain more of why I used them and how it aided the process for me.

Friday, 9 January 2015

Auxiliary Tasks - Audience Research


After printing off my Digi-Pack and showing people my website (both my auxiliary tasks) I asked them what they liked and disliked about them both and then how I can improve on them. This really helped me as I can now edit and improve them both to the standards of my target audience, meaning that will like them more and then more likely to "buy them". 

Tuesday, 6 January 2015

Audience Response



These are the results that our target audience responded to our first draft of our video. The video is uncompleted and so there are a lot of parts where there is just Molly singing where we are going to add in different clips (once filmed) or overlay different clips like we have done a few times during the video. This has helped us greatly as it means we know what the liked (so what we can add more of) and what they disliked (what to either remove, have less of or not film more of) and it also made it clear for us of what we have left to do to make it more appealing to our target audience.